Sense-Making Home Page Syllabi . .

MODEL SYLLABUS
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN COMMUNICATION STUDIES:
DECONSTRUCTING COMMUNICATION THEORIES


CLASS FORMAT AND SCHEDULING:
Lecture and discussion, with 2 - 2 hour sessions per week.

CATALOGUE DESCRIPTION:
An uncovering of the ways in which theories of communication incorporate implicit and explicit images, assumptions and practices, using a variety of challenges and perspectives as deconstructing tools.

CREDIT HOURS:
5 credits

COURSE OBJECTIVES:
The purpose of the course is show how a variety of challenges and perspectives can be used as deconstructing tools to unravel communication theories and examine the images, assumptions, practices, and premises hidden within. While the major focus of the course is on examining communication theories as developed in communication studies, the same tools can be usefully applied to everyday theories of communication. Graduate students will be asked to focus primarily on academic theories in their class applications. Undergraduate students with interests in communication practice and design may wish to apply class work to these everyday lay theories. In both cases, the intent of "deconstructing" is not to marginalize theorizing or scientific inquiry but rather to explore the potential of a variety of approaches for creating the reflexive analysis which is a hallmark standard of all qualitative approaches.

DEVELOPED IN 1996 BY:
Brenda Dervin, Ph.D., Professor (Communication), 3016 Derby Hall, 154 N. Oval Mall, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA
dervin.1@osu.edu. Note: This syllabus was developed for curriculum committee review purposes and as a model for alternative instructors. The readings come solely or primarily from authors writing in the various communication fields. Actual presentations of the class will vary and most versions will rely 30-50% on works from sources in other fields.

ATTENDANCE POLICY:
While attendance is not a formal course requirement, there are four ways in which missing class can hurt you. One is in your participation grade for which attendance is a necessary pre-requisite. The second will be in the resources you will be able to bring to bear on the take-home exams because class lectures and discussions will necessarily impact the selection of the exam questions. The third will be in the resources you will be able to bring to bear on your class paper because class sessions will be in part orient toward assisting students with their selected class projects. If you miss a class you must acquire the missing notes from another student and not from the instructor.

COURSE REQUIREMENTS:
For both undergraduate and graduate students, class grades will be calculated based on:
Class participation & discussion 20%
Two take-home exams 40% (20% each)
Class paper 40%

The two take-home exams with each consist of four sets of three questions from which students are to choose one question per set to be answered in no more than one double-spaced typed page.

The class paper requires that each student identify a communication theory of interest to them. Undergraduates have two options for their papers -- to pursue version 1 described below or version 2. Graduate students must pursue version 2. Ample discussion will be allowed in class for selecting theories of interest, learning how to apply the "deconstructing" tools, and development an understanding of potential comparative dimensions. Suggested paper length for both versions is set at about 20 pages.

Version 1: The student is to use at least five of the tools explored in class in "deconstructing" the selected theory. The class paper must consist of these parts: a) A description of the theory, documented by analysis of literature or analysis of everyday communication practices or products; b) The successive application of the five tools to the selected theory. c) A conclusion which compares and contrasts the tools and the results of their use. The student may select either an academic or an everyday theory of communication.

Version 2: The student is to use at least one of the tools explored in class in such a way that the resulting analysis meets the standards expected for graduate student work in the class as specified below. The student must selected an academic theory of communication.

Graduate students will be expected to do graduate level work including covering the extra readings assigned to them as well as preparing a class paper of quality suitable for submission for convention or journal referee.

CLASS READINGS
An extensive reading list has been developed for this class. Students are expected to pursue reading independently as guided by their own interests. Selected readings are required as indicated below.

There is one required text for the class available at the book stores, as follows:

Levy, Mark R. and Gurevitch, Michael, eds. Defining media studies: reflections on the future of the field. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.

There is in addition an extensive reserve reading list. Copies of all items on the reserve list as well as all items in the required text are on reserve in the library. Full citations for the all the readings are included in
Master Bibliography for Model Syllabi Qualitative Research in Communication Studies. In the schedule below, readings are identified by last name of senior author and an abbreviated document title.

In addition to the required text, a supplementary text from another field --- educational psychology -- has been selected because of its potential value for students. This book is only available at the bookstores.

Slife, Brent D. and Williams, Richard N., What's behind the research: Discovering hidden assumptions in the behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, Ca.: Sage, 1995.

Reading assignments are listed n the schedule below, with items marked as follows:
+items are required readings for both undergraduate and graduate students
*items are required readings for graduate students
- items are available for those who wish to pursue issues in more depth

COURSE SCHEDULE:

Wk FOCUS, READINGS, ASSIGNMENTS
1 INTRODUCTION
2 WHENCE COMMUNICATION THEORIES? WHENCE THE FIELD?
Course text:
+Krippendorff, The past of communication's hoped for future
- Peters, Genealogical notes on 'the field'
- Rakow, The curriculum is the future
+Rosengren, From field to frog ponds
- Rogers, The past and the future of communication study...
*Shoemaker, Communication in crisis: theory, curricula, and power
*Swanson, Fragmentation, the field and the future

Reserve list:
- Conrad, Was Pogo right?
- Gross, There they go again
- Gouran, The task scholars report in historical and future perspective
- Wood, Toward the 21st century: The future of speech communication
- Zarefsky, E pluribus unum: one partial vision

Supplementary text:
- Slife, Science and human behavior
3 INTRA-FIELD DISSENTS
Course text:
+Beniger, Communication -- embrace the subject, not the field
*Craig, Why are there so many communication theories?
- O'Keefe, Against theory
- Shepard, Building a discipline of communication

Reserve list:
- Asante, The escape into hyperbole: Comm and political correctness
- Berger, Evidence? For what?
- Burgoon, PC at last! PC at last! Thank God almighty, we are PC at last!
- Carey, Political correctness and cultural studies
- Grossberg, Being politically correct in a politically incorrect world
- Liska, On the death, dismemberment, or disestablishment of the dominant
 3  CHALLENGES TO ACADEMIC PRACTICE
Course text:
*Monahan, The hierarchy of institutional values in the comm discipline
- Newcomb, Target practice: a Batesonian 'field' guide for comm studies
+Tracey, Scholarship as silence

Reserve list:
- Docherty, Scholarship as silence
- Evans,"Masks": Literacy, ideology, and hegemony in the academy
- Lannamann, Interpersonal comm research as ideological practice
- Henderson, Paris is burning and academic conservatism
 4  THEORIES OF THE SUBJECT AS CHALLENGE
Reserve list:
+Anderson, The nature of the individual in communication research
- Beach, W. A., Orienting to the phenomenon
+Ganguly, Accounting for others...
*Grodin, The self in a mediated communication
*Lindlof, Seeking a path of greater resistance: the self becoming method...

Supplementary text:
- Slife, Human images
 ***  TAKE HOME EXAM #1 DUE AT BEGINNING OF FIRST CLASS
SESSION THIS WEEK
5   ONTOLOGY AND EPISTEMOLOGY AS CHALLENGE
Course text:
*Braman, Harmonization of systems: the third stage...

Reserve list:
- Brown, Logics of discovery as narratives of conversion...
- Conrad, Rhetorical/communication theory as an ontology for structuration
*Dervin, Information<---->democracy
- Grossberg, Does communication theory need intersubjectivity?
- Smith. Diversity and order in communication theory
+Jackson, Method as argument
- Jacobson, Theories as communication
- Folger, Interpretive and structural claims about confrontations
+Lannamann, Outside the boundary: A critique of comm as representation
- VanOosting, ...Use of imaginative lit for comm theory...precautions
*Warnick, Structuralism vs. phenomenology

Supplementary text:
- Slife, Ways of knowing...determinism...reductionism
 6  THE CRITICAL CHALLENGE
Course text:
+McChesney, Critical communication research at the crossroads
- Meehan, Rethinking political economy...
+Schiller, ...Prospects for the study of comm as a social force

Reserve list:
- Hardt, The return of the "critical" and the challenge of radical dissent...
- Hardt,Communication and the question of history
*Medhurst, Resistance, conservatism, and theory building: A cautionary
- Moffitt, Bringing critical theory & ethic[s]...to definitions of a "public"
- Nerone, Theory and history
*Real, The debate on critical theory and the study of comm...
 7  THE CULTURE CHALLENGE
Course text:
*Grossberg, Can cultural studies find true happiness in communication

Reserve list:
- Davis, Beyond the culture wars: the agenda for res on comm & culture
*Burrowes, From functionalism to cultural studies
+Rakow, Some good news-bad news about a culture-centered paradigm
+Real, The challenge of a culture-centered paradigm:
- Stamp, Criteria for developing and assessing theories of interpersonal
 8  FEMINIST SCHOLARSHIP AS CHALLENGE
Course text:
+Steeves, ...Development communication and the challenge of feminism
Reserve list:
*Kramarae, Chronic power problems
*Lugones, Have we got a theory for you! Feminist theory, cultural...
+Steiner, Feminist theorizing and communication ethics
- Wood, Telling our stories: Narratives as a basis for theorizing sexual
 9  DECONSTRUCTION AS CHALLENGE
Course text:
+Jensen, The consequences of vocabularies
Reserve list:
*Biersecker, Rethinking...from within the thematic of differance
- Cobb, A critique of critical discourse analysis: deconstructing and...
- Desilet, ..The conflict between hermeneutics and deconstruction...
*Jordon, On ethnography ...reading narratives or deconstructing discourse?
- Laditka, Language, power, and play: The dance of deconstruction and +Pearce, Deconstructing gender differences in persuasibility: A bricolage
- Sardar, The crisis of postmodernism
 ***  TAKE HOME EXAM #2 DUE AT BEGINNING OF FIRST CLASS
SESSION THIS WEEK
 10  TIME AND SPACE AS CHALLENGES
Course text:
+Dervin, Verbing communication: mandate for disciplinary invention
Reserve list:
- Beach, W. A., Maps and diggings
*Brummett, Theorizing without totalizing
- Dervin, ...From entities and states to processes and dynamics
- Sigman, Toward study of the consequentiality (not consequences)
- Sigman, (Re)situating social communication in consequentiality
- Woodward, Toward a normative-contextualist theory of technology
- Rosnow, The spirit of contextualism
- Perry, Implications of a contextualist approach to media-effects research
 10  COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS AS CHALLENGE
Reserve list:
- Blumler, An introduction to comparative communication research
- Carter, Comparative analysis, theory, and cross-cultural communication
- Ito, Theories on interpersonal comm styles from a Japenese perspective...
*Pearce, On comparing theories: Treating theories as commensurate or
+Rosengren, Comparative communication research: from exploration to
- Swanson, Managing theoretical diversity in cross-national studies of
- Tehranian, Is comparative communication theory possible/desirable?
 10  PRACTICE AND POLICY AS CHALLENGE
Course text:
+Avery, Making a difference in the real world
- Noam, Reconnecting comm studies with comm policy
Reserve list:
- Arnett, Defining communication: a practical act
*Conquergood, Between rigor and relevance: Rethinking applied
- Eadie, Making a difference: The status and challenges of applied
- Gandy , On building theory from the inside out
- Miller, Some thoughts on the...dichotomy between pure and applied
- Seibold,Theoria and praxis: Means and ends of communication research
- Wood, Theorizing practice, practicing theory
 10  AUDIENCE AS EXEMPLAR:
Course text:
+Morley, Active audience theory: pendulums and pitfalls
- Jensen, ...Problems and potentials of historical reception studies

Reserve list:
- Anderson, The pragmatics of audience in research and theory
- Ang, Ethnography and radical contextualism in audience studies
*Ang, Living room wars: Rethinking media audiences for a postmodern...
- Chang, Deconstructing the audience
- Dervin, Audience as listener and learner, teacher and confidante
- Dervin, Users as research inventions
- Press, The active viewer & the prob of interpretation: Reconciling...
- Radway, The hegemony of 'specificity' and the impasse in audience res...
- Liebes, Notes on the struggle to define involvement in television viewing
- Rosengren, ...Comparisons & confrontations: towards an audience..
- Webster, Victim, consumer, or commodity? Audience models
 EX  
 ***  FINAL CLASS PAPER DUE AT END OF REGULARLY SCHEDULED EXAM PERIOD FOR THIS CLASS


This syllabus is available in alternative formats upon request. Students with disabilities are responsible for making their needs known to the instructor and for seeking available assistance in a timely manner.

 



 Return to Top

Page last updated 2/25/98