CITATION AND COPYRIGHT INFORMATION:
Cite as: Schaefer, D.J. & Dervin, B. (2005, May). Online discussion groups, situation movement states, and dialogic quality: The potential for democratic electronic public spheres. Paper presented at International Communication Association annual meeting, New York City.
©David Schaefer and Brenda Dervin , 2005.

ABSTRACT:
Recently, theorists concerned about the democratic quality of electronic group discussions have advocated the incorporation of situational information to facilitate consensus/dissensus activity. In this paper, we demonstrate the utilization of a discussion group design and analytical process informed by Sense-Making Methodology to highlight the relationship between situational aspects of online dialogue and consensus/dissensus activity. We analyzed 1,360 messages submitted to three pedagogical discussion groups. Th e postings fell into two broad situational modes: (a) dialogic, which coincided with an outward orientation and a greater number of agreeing/disagreeing micro-practices, and (b) contemplative, which demonstrated more inwardly-focused personalized observations and far fewer agreeing/disagreeing micro-practices. These findings suggest that, counter to received theories advocating the privileging of user-to-user interaction within online discussion groups, both modes appeared to be important for robust communicative activities.

TO OBTAIN FULL TEXT:
You may request access to the full text URL by completing this form. (This will open a new window.)

OTHER MATERIALS BY THESE AUTHOR ON THIS WEB SITE:
For Schaefer,
See:  http://communication.sbs.ohio-state.edu/sense-making/AAauthors/authorlistschaefer.html
For Dervin,
See:  http://communication.sbs.ohio-state.edu/sense-making/AAauthors/authorlistdervin.html