CITATION AND COPYRIGHT INFORMATION:
Cite as: Dervin, B. (1994). Information <--> democracy: An examination of underlying assumptions. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45 (6), 369-385. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. EJ 488 232). Reprinted in: B. Dervin & L. Foreman-Wernet (with E. Lauterbach) (Eds.). (2003). Sense-Making Methodology reader: Selected writings of Brenda Dervin (pp. 73-100). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
© Hampton Press and Brenda Dervin (2003), reprinted by permission of John Wiley & Sons (1994).

BOOK PURCHASE:
To purchase a copy of this book, visit www.amazon.com, or contact Hampton Press at (800) 894-8955.

ABSTRACT:
This article assumes a widely accepted narrative, with myth-like status, which binds together dominant conceptions of the information <--> democracy relationship. The article aims to “deconstruct” this narrative by examining it in the framework of six sets of assumptions regarding ontology (views of the nature of reality and human beings) and epistemology (views of the nature of knowing and the standards of judging knowing as informative). The six sets of assumptions are presented as stereotypes, or ideal type extractions, of literatures relevant to discussions of information in the sciences and humanities. The six sets are labeled: dogma, naturalism, cultural relativity, constructivism, post-modernism, and communitarianism. Each set is examined in terms of how it serves the information <--> democracy narrative and how it leaves spaces for power to exert forces which in effect defy the narrative. Implications for the design and implementation of information/communication systems are discussed.

TO OBTAIN FULL TEXT:
You may request access to the full text URL by completing this form. (This will open a new window.)

OTHER MATERIALS BY THIS AUTHOR ON THIS WEBSITE:
See:  http://communication.sbs.ohio-state.edu/sense-making/AAauthors/authorlistdervin.html